Logo in audit #62512 >

Logo in audit #62512
Posted since : 08/14/2008 18:37 by sniper de
Note : 116 Points (11 Votes).
Visit : 204

    Comments

  1. djaz
     
    frdjaz

    an entire rework is necessary....

  2. Nenigrouss
     
    frNenigrouss (Website Administrator)

    yes it is true... We don't see anything in small

  3. ehcirel
     
    frehcirel

    i can't read the name

  4. ADcreations
     
    frADcreations

    + 1 djaz

  5. lillustrateur
     
    frlillustrateur

    it's certainly not a good logo

  6. cfca
     
    frcfca

    no readable at all, you'll have to simplify...

  7. joe
     
    frjoe

    eurgh !?

  8. jacadi33
     
    frjacadi33

    too complicated, it requires a super relocking !!

  9. coxine
     
    frcoxine

    +1 I agree ! :-) Needs a relooking, not a logo

  10. lsu
     
    delsu

    Es ist kein Logo.

  11. artisolas
     
    frartisolas

    hasbeen

  12. nuo
     
    frnuo

    Is it a logotype or a mistake ?

Post a comment